I suggest to persons who think that they have found a meteorite to get a chemical analysis by Actlabs or some other lab that can provide good compositional data. There are several different ways to determine whether or not a rock is a meteorite. A chemical analysis is a good one because it is cheaper to do than most of the other tests and it is usually unambiguous (meaning, with a chemical analysis, I am not likely to say, “I still don’t know” or “maybe.”)
So that you can check your data yourself, I show plots here of concentrations or ratios of concentrations of several chemical elements in meteorites compared to rocks people have had analyzed by Actlabs or some other lab. The horizontal axis of all the plots is “Fe2O3(T) + MgO.” Actlabs and most labs that analyze rocks reports total iron as Fe2O3 because in Earth rocks much or most of the iron occurs as Fe(III), that is, ferric iron. There is little or no Fe(III) in freshly fallen meteorites; it is all Fe(II), ferrous iron, and Fe(zero), iron metal. For convenience, however, I use Fe2O3 in the plots. If you had an analysis done, just add the Fe2O3 and MgO values together for comparison.
In the legends, the percentages (%) represent the relative abundance of each meteorite type among stony meteorites. I cannot emphasize enough: Most meteorites are ordinary chondrites.
Many terrestrial rocks have higher concentrations of SiO2 (silica) than any meteorite because they contain quartz and meteorites do not contain any significant amount quartz or other silica minerals. If SiO2 is greater than 60%, the rock is not a meteorite. The only possible exception would be a lunar granite, which is a volumetrically insignificant component of the Apollo collection. No granitic meteorites have been found yet. The low-SiO2 terrestrial rocks are mainly limestones [low Fe2O3(T) + MgO] and iron ores [high Fe2O3(T) + MgO]. Terrestrial rocks with 45-55% SiO2 are usually basalts.
Most meteorites, especially lunar meteorites, have higher concentrations of aluminum (Al2O3) than terrestrial rocks of similar Fe2O3+MgO. For an explanation of why lunar meteorites plot along the diagonal trend, see How Do We Know That It’s a Rock From the Moon? Feldspars (or clays derived therefrom) are the major carrier of aluminum in terrestrial rocks, too.
Lunar meteorites also have high concentrations of calcium (CaO) because most of the plagioclase is the Ca-rich extreme, anorthite. Terrestrial rocks with high CaO are usually rich in calcite, like the limestones that plot around 50% CaO. The terrestrial rocks that plot with the martian meteorites are mostly basalts, which have similar mineralogy to the martian basalts (but, see Na2O and K2O).
The ratio of CaO to Al2O3 varies greatly in terrestrial rocks.
In contrast, in most meteorites, virtually all the Al2O3 and most of the CaO is carried by feldspar, so there is little variation in CaO/Al2O3.
Among meteorites, MgO necessarily increases with Fe2O3(T) + MgO. Some terrestrial rocks lie off the trend because they have MgO/Fe2O3(T) ratios outside the range for meteorites. High-MgO terrestrial rocks are mainly ultramafic rocks like peridotites, dunites, and serpentinites. Low-MgO rocks are rich in quartz, calcite, or hematite.
The same is largely true for Fe2O3(T). High-Fe2O3 meteorwrongs are iron ores, often hematite concretions.
The ratio of magnesium to iron does not vary greatly among most kinds of stony meteorites. Rocks with MgO/Fe2O3(T) <0.2 or >6 are not probably meteorites. Only rare lunar granites have low MgO/Fe2O3(T), and none of these has been found as a meteorite.
The ratio of manganese to iron varies greatly among terrestrial rocks.
The ratio of manganese to iron does not vary much within different groups of meteorites. The Fe2O3(T)/MnO ratio (or Fe/Mn or FeO/MnO) is not as reliable a test for meteorites as some sources imply, although ratios of <60 are inconsistent with lunaites and >50 are inconsistent with eucrites, for example. Many earth rocks have Fe2O3(T)/MnO in the range of meteorites.
Sodium is one of the best elements for distinguishing between terrestrial rocks and meteorites. Most terrestrial rocks are richer in Na2O than any meteorite. Rocks with >2% Na2O are probably not meteorites. The high-Na martian meteorite is the NWA 7034 clan (“Black Beauty”) and the high-Na achondrite is Grave Nunataks (GRA) 06128/9.
Sodium and potassium are both alkali elements, and all alkali elements are in low concentrations in meteorites compared to most terrestrial rocks. Rocks with greater than 0.6% K2O are probably not meteorites.
One of the best elements for distinguishing meteorites from Earth rocks is Cr. Nearly all stony meteorites have high concentrations of Cr compared to most Earth rocks. The most Cr-poor meteorites are the feldspathic lunar meteorites, which have high concentrations of Al2O3 and CaO. Cr-rich terrestrial rocks tend to be ultramafic rocks like dunites, peridotites, pyroxenites, and serpentinites. Actlabs has a detection limit for Cr of 20 ppm. I have plotted all Actlabs data reported as “<20 ppm” at 10 ppm. The two low-Cr points for martian meteorites represent the 2 stones of Los Angeles.
Concentrations of Ni are high in chondrites, typically about 10,000 ppm (e.g., ~1%). Nickel is not particularly useful for identifying achondrites. Six of the 615 Actlabs analyses of “meteorwrongs” plotted here are, in fact, meteorites: 4 ordinary chondrites, 1 pallasite, and 1 iron meteorite. Actlabs has a detection limit for Ni of 20 ppm. I have plotted all Actlabs data reported as “<20 ppm” at 10 ppm.
Notes, Caveats, and References
1) Terrestrial – Meteorwrong. All the “meteorwrongs” in the plots (white circles) represent rocks that persons have had analyzed by Actlabs (N=615) for which the data have been sent to me. As I note in the Ni (nickel) plot above, 6 of the meteorwrongs are actually meteorites.
2) Terrestrial – Geostandard. Many countries have agencies that pulverize large quantities of rock for use as interlaboratory standards. Several hundred geostandards are available that represent all common, and many uncommon, rock types of the Earth. For most of these, there are many analytical data available. I have selected from the compilation of Govindaraju (1994) and Korotev (1996) data for 156 such rocks. I have avoided data for soils and unconsolidated sediments, monominerallic rocks (except chert, sandstone, limestone, hornblendite, magnesite), ores (except for some iron ores, because these are sometimes mistaken for meteorites), and geostandards that do not have data for the elements that I plot here. In total there are data for 7 andesites, 5 anorthosites, 17 basalts, 2 carbonatites, 1 chert, 6 diabases, 2 diorite or diorite gneiss, 2 dolomites, 4 dunites, 15 gabbros, 21 granites and related rocks, 5 granodiorites, 1 hornblendite, 6 iron ore or iron formation rocks, 2 kimberlites, 1 quartz latite, 10 limestones, 2 lujavrites, 1 magnesite, 1 monzonite, 1 norite, 3 peridotites, 1 pyroxenite, 5 rhyolites including 1 obsidian, 1 sandstone, 5 schists, 3 serpentinites, 12 shales, 2 slates, 6 syenites, 2 tonalites, 3 trachytes, and 2 “ultrabasic rocks.”
3) Terrestrial – Tektite. I have plotted data of Koeberl (1986) for various types of tektites. Note that tektites have compositions like terrestrial rocks (because they are terrestrial rocks!), not like meteorites.
4) All (but 6) of the white points represent terrestrial rocks. All the black points and colored points are for meteorites.
5) All the meteorites in the plots (all square symbols) are stony meteorites, not stony-irons or irons.
6) Most (~95%) stony meteorites are chondrites, and most chondrites are ordinary chondrites. If you have actually found a meteorite, it is probably some kind of chondrite. That is why I made the points for chondrites black and the ordinary chondrites BIG and black. Chondrites are most dissimilar to Earth rocks. Each black point represents the average composition of one of the chondrite groups: H, L, LL, EH, EL, CI, CM, CV, CO, CR, CO, R, Ac, & K. Data from Wasson & Kallemeyn (1988).
7) The lunar meteorite data are from my own database. Each point represents a different meteorite.
8) For the martian meteorites, eucrites, howardites, diogenites, and “other rare achondrites,” each point represents a meteorite or analysis. Data mostly from Jarosewich (1990), Lodders & Fegley (1998), and Mittlefehldt et al. (1998).
9) The plots presented here reasonably represent >99% of all meteorites.
10) It is like lottery numbers – you do not win unless the composition is consistent with ALL the chemical-composition parameters shown here, not just some of them!
11) I have not shown data for trace elements other than Mn, Cr, and Ni. Data for individual trace elements like Rb, Sr, Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta, Th, U, and the rare-earth elements are not particularly useful for distinguishing earth rocks from planetary rocks, although ratios among these elements often are useful, e.g., rare earth “patterns.”
12) I should show some plots here for chalcophile (sulfur-loving) elements – Cu, Zn, As, In, Sn, and Sb. The problem is that the concentrations of these elements are so low in achondrites that there are few data to plot. Chondrites have considerably higher concentrations of chalcophile elements than do achondrites.
|Chalcophile-element concentrations in chondrites (range of group means of Wasson & Kallemeyn, 1988) values in ppm|
So, for example, if you have a rock with >5 ppm As (arsenic), then the rock is not a meteorite. Many terrestrial sedimentary rocks, as well as metamorphic rocks that formed from sedimentary rocks, have concentrations of chalcophile elements much higher than those in the table above.
Govindaraju K. (1994) 1994 compilation of working values and sample description for 383 geostandards. Geostandards Newsletter 18, 1–158.
Jarosewich E. (1990) Chemical analysis of meteorites: A compilation of stony and iron meteorite analyses. Meteoritics 25, 323-327.
Koeberl C. (2006) Geochemistry of tektites and impact glasses. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 1986 14, 323-350.
Korotev R. L. (1996) A self-consistent compilation of elemental concentration data for 93 geochemical reference samples. Geostandards Newsletter 20, 217–245.
Lodders K. and Fegley B. Jr. (1998) The Planetary Scientist’s Companion, Oxford University Press, New York, 371 pp.
Mittlefehldt D. W., McCoy T. J., Goodrich C. A., and Kracher A. (1998) Chapter 4. Non-chondritic meteorites from asteroidal bodies. In Reviews in Mineralogy, Vol. 36, Planetary Materials (ed. J. J. Papike), pp. 4-1–4-195, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington.
Wasson J. T. and Kallemeyn G. W. (1988) Compositions of chondrites. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 325, 535-544.